Three Marks of Existence

Summary

Across Buddhist ontology, theoretical physics, systems biology, and cognitive phenomenology, a singular realization emerges: there is no fixed, independent, or unchanging core at the heart of reality. From early Buddhism's Three Marks of Existence (tilakkhaṇa) to the Mahāyāna formulation of emptiness (śūnyatā; see Nāgārjuna), what appears as solid "things" or a permanent "self" is actually a dynamic, interdependent web of relational processes.

1. The Buddhist Philosophical Engine: From Anattā to Śūnyatā

The foundational architecture of Buddhist insight rests on the Three Marks of Existence (Pāli: tilakkhaṇa; Sanskrit: trilakṣaṇa), which diagnose how human perception misinterprets the nature of reality.[1]

The Three Marks of Existence (Tilakkhaṇa)

The Mahāyāna Expansion: Śūnyatā (Emptiness)

While early Buddhist schools (Abhidharma) broke the self down into momentary, irreducible physical and mental building blocks (dharmas; an inquiry later dramatized in the Milinda Pañha and The Ship of Theseus and the Chariot of King Milinda), the Mahāyāna philosopher Nāgārjuna (c. 150–250 CE), founder of the Madhyamaka ("Middle Way") school, radicalized this insight.[2]

In his Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way), Nāgārjuna argued that not only do sentient beings lack a core self, but the fundamental building blocks of reality (dharmas) also lack intrinsic nature (svabhāva).[2:1] Everything is characterized by emptiness (śūnyatā).

Important

Emptiness Is Not Nothingness: In Madhyamaka philosophy, śūnyatā does not mean nihilistic voidness or non-existence. Rather, because phenomena arise through dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda; cf. Jay L. Garfield on the Three Turnings), they are "empty" of independent, self-sustaining existence. Because nothing has a fixed essence, everything is capable of change and interaction.

2. The Physical Universe: Relational Quantum Mechanics

When modern physics probes the subatomic substrate of the material world, the classical intuition of reality as a collection of discrete, solid "objects" dissolves entirely.

From Solid Matter to Quantum Fields

Nouns vs. Verbs in Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM)

Introduced by theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli in 1996, Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) discards the notion that a physical system possesses an absolute, observer-independent state or fixed properties in isolation.[3]

3. Biology and Ecology: Interbeing and the Cellular Ship of Theseus

Moving from quantum physics to macroscopic biology and ecology, the absence of an isolated core manifests as radical ecological and physiological interdependence.

Thích Nhất Hạnh and Interbeing (Tiếp Hiện)

To translate the abstract philosophical concept of śūnyatā into lived ecological awareness, Vietnamese Zen master Thích Nhất Hạnh coined the term "interbeing" in his commentary on the Heart Sūtra, The Heart of Understanding.[5]

Quote

"If you are a poet, you will see clearly that there is a cloud floating in this sheet of paper. Without a cloud, there will be no rain; without rain, the trees cannot grow; and without trees, we cannot make paper... If we return the sunshine, the logger, and the mind to their sources, there is no paper left. 'To be' is to inter-be."[5:1]

The Biological Ship of Theseus (cf. The Ship of Theseus)

The human body itself defies the notion of a static physical boundary:

4. Phenomenology and the Mind: Deconstructing the Inner CEO

While recognizing emptiness in physics or ecology can remain an intellectual exercise, applying anattā to human consciousness directly challenges our most intimate psychological assumption: the feeling of an internal controller.

The Illusion of the Cartesian Theater

In everyday cognition, we experience a compelling sense of a permanent "I"—an executive "CEO" or homunculus sitting behind the eyes, authoring thoughts, witnessing experiences, and steering behavior. In 20th-century analytic philosophy, this was diagnosed by Gilbert Ryle as a category mistake—the myth of the "ghost in the machine" (see Gilbert Ryle's-The Concept of Mind and Ghost in the Machine).

The Five Aggregates (Khandhas) and Vipassanā

In Buddhist psychology, what we label as "the self" is actually a rapidly shifting bundle of Five Aggregates (pañcakkhandha; examined extensively in Vasubandhu's-Triṃśikā-vijñaptimātratā and Constructs of the Mind-Unmasking Consciousness in East and West):[1:4]

  1. Form (Rūpa): Physical body and sensory organs.

  2. Sensation (Vedanā): Immediate hedonic tone (pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral) of an experience.

  3. Perception (Saññā): Cognitive recognition and labeling of sensory inputs.

  4. Mental Formations (Saṅkhāra): Volitional impulses, habits, emotions, and intentions.

  5. Consciousness (Viññāṇa): Bare awareness arising in dependence on a sense organ and a sense object.

Info

The Meditative Investigation (Vipassanā): When a practitioner turns attention inward during insight meditation (vipassanā) to locate the "thinker" behind thoughts or the "watcher" behind awareness, no permanent witness can be found (see The Core Instruction - Turning the Gaze Inward). Instead, awareness reveals only a continuous, self-organizing stream of passing sensations, memories, and mental states. The sense of an "observer" is revealed to be just another momentary thought arising within the stream. In modern contemplative neuroscience, this experiential dissolution correlates directly with the down-regulation of the brain's narrative self-referential core, the Default Mode Network (DMN).

5. Psychological Impact: From Groundlessness to Liberation

Confronting the absence of a solid core—both externally in the world and internally within the mind—triggers a profound shift in how the human nervous system relates to experience.

Phase Psychological Experience Existential & Ethical Outcome
Initial Encounter (Groundlessness) Vertigo, disorientation, or existential dread when the cognitive habit of reifying a solid self and world is disrupted. In Tibetan Buddhism, this is recognized as losing one's conceptual footing when the "rug of solid reality" is pulled away (a dynamic examined in Terror Management Theory, Existential Neuroscience, and Buddhist Contemplation and Becker's Denial of Death and Buddhist Psychology).
Integration (Ontological Relief) Relaxation of defensive ego-clinging (upādāna); cessation of the exhausting effort required to maintain a fixed identity. Personal Freedom: Because you have no fixed core, you are not permanently defined by past mistakes, trauma, habits, or social labels.
Relational Shift (Compassion) Recognition that other people and institutions are also dynamic processes rather than fixed, malicious essences. Softening of Anger: Rigid resentment and despair dissolve when others are seen as shifting sets of conditions responding to prior conditions (transitioning from an isolated atomic ego to a relational Dividual).

The Paradox of Groundlessness

References


Resonant Notes

The following notes in the vault share direct thematic, ontological, and philosophical connections with the Three Marks of Existence:

🔴 Buddhist Philosophy, Emptiness & Classical Ontology

🟡 Quantum Relationality, Statistical Mechanics & Time

🟢 Cognitive Science, Mind Deconstruction & Existential Psychology



  1. Glossary of Buddhist Terms / Three Marks of Existence (Tilakkhaṇa) and the Dhammapada / madhyamaka.com ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  2. Jan Westerhoff / Nāgārjuna — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy / plato.stanford.edu ↩︎ ↩︎

  3. Federico Laudisa and Carlo Rovelli / Relational Quantum Mechanics — Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy / plato.stanford.edu ↩︎

  4. Revista Minerva / Relational Quantum Mechanics: Relations Before Things-in-Themselves / revistaminerva.pt ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

  5. Thích Nhất Hạnh / The Heart of Understanding: Commentaries on the Prajnaparamita Heart Sutra / explore7.files.wordpress.com ↩︎ ↩︎ ↩︎

🌐 Curated by Rob Amo • Designed for intellectually curious global minds.